Welcome!

This informative blog allows plastics professionals to discuss plastics training and technology. Brought to you by Routsis Training: the plastic industry's premiere training provider.

Creating a Training Plan…

I was recently at a company who purchased some training a while back from a different provider under the guise of having a ‘resource’ for all their employees to use…

My Comments
Training is good, but it is critical that you tie the training to each job function through the use of a training plan. Without a structured training plan focused on job title you will not be able to make a change to your workforce. In general, your employees will not go and train unless there is a structure to show them what they are supposed to do when they train.
-Andy

The Best Way to Process…

I was recently at a molding facility during a training implementation was in need of some training due to a lack of fundamentals among the employees…

Company President
What is the best way to process, and why don’t we just have everybody process that way starting tomorrow?
My Response
I told her that there were ways that there are many ways to process, and there are a few methods which are far superior to others. Unfortunately without a strong background in processing knowledge your employees will have no reason to understand why this method is better.
Essentially, people who have been making a living molding a particular way do not just change their entire approach to processing because someone tells them it is better. You need to educate them on plastics, machinery, materials, processing, and tooling to ensure that they know why it is a better way.
Additional Thoughts
There are always steps which your employees can take to improve the process. As they see the success they will continue to employ more cost saving, and process improving techniques. This is one of the reasons why it can be easier to teach someone who has never processed that to teach someone who has processed for years.
-Andy

Melt Temperature and Density…

I received this excellent question last week…

Saeed
In one of your videos, you state that higher melt temperatures will increase part weight. To my understanding, a less viscous material is pumped in the cavity with a relative ease thus increasing the part weight. Could you please guide me as to whether or not a decrease in density negates the above?

My Response
You are correct that you will be injecting a less dense material in this scenario… but the higher melt temperature causes many things to occur, but the 2 major factors increasing the part weight and density are listed below:
1) There will be a higher amount of material flow and in-mold pressure during packing resulting in more material entering the mold during both 1st and 2nd stage.
2) A higher melt temperature promotes an increase in part shrinkage resulting in a higher overall part density.
Additional Thoughts
This question points out how complex the interactions between the mold, machine, material, and  injection molding process can become.
-Andy

Follow-Up on Increasing Injection Velocity…

I received an email from a blog reader about another benefit to increasing injection velocity…

Harry
Another reason we use a higher injection velocity in our facility is to increase the amount of packing that is possible.

My Comments
This is correct because of two reasons. First, the gate begins to freeze the moment the material enters the gate. The shorter time required to fill the mold allows more time for packing. The second reason is because the pressure loss within the mold cavity is decreased, allowing more packing pressure to reach the extremities of the mold during packing.
-Andy

Decreasing Energy Consumption during Injection…

I was at a company recently and the engineer was confused about how to reduce energy consumption during injection…

Engineer
I know higher injection velocities reduce variability, but a lower injection speed uses less pressure and thus reduces the overall energy consumption… right?

My Response
Actually, a higher velocity reduces overall energy consumption during injection even though the injection pressure is increased. Increasing the injection velocity decreases the material viscosity through shear thinning. As a result, the overall energy required to push the final volume of polymer necessary to fill the mold is decreased.
In an actual example performed by one of our trainers, the data from a molding process which was filled at two different times is shown below:
Slow Fill:
Fill time = 3.15sec
Transfer Pressure = 10,460psi
Fast Fill:
Fill time = 0.83sec
Transfer Pressure = 11,910psi
Although the faster fill time has a higher pressure at transfer, the molding machine applied the injection pressure for 27% of the time necessary to fill the mold at the slower speed. When you multiply the fill time by the transfer pressure you get the following effective (or relative) viscosity:
Effective Viscosity = t x psi
Slow Fill = 32,950 psi-s
Fast Fill = 9,890 psi-s
Assuming the pressure profiles are similar in shape, it can be reasonably proposed that the faster fill consumed approximately 30% of the energy necessary to fill the mold at the slower speed.
Additional Thoughts
The additional benefit to filling faster is that the polymer fills the mold and begins to cool faster. In this case the overall cycle time could drop as much as 2 seconds due to the higher injection viscosity.
-Andy