Welcome!

This informative blog allows plastics professionals to discuss plastics training and technology. Brought to you by Routsis Training: the plastic industry's premiere training provider.

Cooling Power Calculation

I was just asked this question…
Jason
How can I determine the proper size chiller to cool my parts efficiently? 
My Response
To determine the correct size chiller you must first calculate the cooling time, total amount of heat to be removed, the cooling power, the cooling power per line, and the required volumetric flow rate.
A basic way to calculate the cooling time for this purpose is to use a common rule: 2 X [wall thickness (mm)]^2
To calculate the total amount of heat to be removed use the equation:
Q= (combined mass of the parts and feed system) x Cp x (Tmelt -Teject)
Where: Cp is the specific heat of your plastic, Tmelt is your melt temperature, and Teject is the temperature of your parts at ejection. This answer should be in Joules. 
After calculating the amount of heat to be removed divide it by your cooling time to get an answer in the units of J/s or Watts. This is the power you will need to cool your part. 
The cooling power per line can be calculated by dividing the power you need to cool your part by the number of cooling lines in the part. Example: You had a 1000W estimate for the required power to cool your part and you have 4 cooling lines. The result is 250 W per cooling line.
To calculate the volumetric flow rate you will need to cool your parts you must:
Divide the cooling power per line by: [allowable increase in coolant temp x density of the coolant x specific heat of the coolant]
This calculation should result in a number with the units of m^3/s or ft^3/s. 
You can now use the estimated coolant flow rate to determine which machine will meet your needs. 
-Andy

More Discussion about Open vs. Closed-Loop 1st Stage Injection…

Recently I have had many questions by phone, email, and Linked-In pertaining to mold filling for open-loop molding machines. As a result, I wish to clarify the basic difference between the optimal filling strategy for closed-loop molding machines vs. open-loop molding machines with respect to compensating for viscosity variations to maintain process consistency…

1st Stage Fill

Closed-Loop Molding Machines: 1st stage injection on these molding machines is based on maintaining a consistent screw velocity. If there is adequate injection pressure available, and the machine is operating properly, the polymer will leave the barrel with a consistent shear rate. If the injection speed is high enough to cause shear thinning, the volume that is injected should be consistent over a long period of time. Although there will be normal variations in material viscosity, a process using 95% fill during 1st stage injection should maintain a short shot over an extended period of time.
Open-Loop Molding Machines: 1st stage injection on these machines is based on maintaining a consistent injection pressure. In this case, the screw velocity will drop as the resistance to flow increases… resulting in a constantly decreasing shear rate. Since this machine is incapable of maintaining a consistent shear rate, viscosity shifts will significantly affect the fill time as well as the volume of material which is injected. For this reason, an open-loop machine cannot maintain a consistent short shot during 1st stage. As a result, the most consistent processes, on open-loop machines, tend to result from completely filling and packing the part during 1st stage injection.

Additional Thoughts
It is completely possible to mold acceptable parts using a complete 1st stage fill with a closed-loop machine, or a 1st stage short shot with an open-loop machine… it’s just that the process will require significantly more adjustment as the viscosity of the material shifts over time. The above comments is strictly focused on what 1st stage injection strategy generally provides the least process variation.
-Andy

Documenting Open-Loop Processes…

I received this follow-up question from one of our previous blog entries…

Chris
I don’t understand why it’s best to be full at the end
of 1st stage on an open loop machine. Our open loop machines have 1st stage and
then total injection forward time which is basically filling and packing time
together. We are still decoupled at the end of 1st stage (filling). If you can
be decoupled at the end of first stage then I think 1 sheet with machine
independent values would work.

note: This question is a response from the following blog: Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Process Sheets…

My Response
Generally speaking, the pressure-limited nature of an open-loop machine will result in an inconsistent fill during 1st stage. There are technologies which can improve the consistency of fill, such as highly accurate proximity sensors and improved flow control valves, but most open-loop machines cannot consistently maintain a short shot around 95% full while using a lower fill time that was established and optimized on a closed-loop machine. For these reasons, most open-loop molders opt for having the mold completely full during 1st stage to help ensure long term consistency. For this reason, it was recommended to document the process differently than a closed-loop process.

If your machine can maintain this consistency while using a fill time comparable to a closed-loop machine, then such process documentation can be very useful for both machine types… but this level of accuracy and consistency in an open-loop machine is typically rare.
Additional Thoughts
In general, the filling behavior of open-loop and closed loop molding machines are such that a different machine-independent process sheet is typically preferred.
-Andy

Calculating Intensification Ratio

I was just asked the question…
Dave
How can I calculate the intensification ratio of my injection molding machine if I do not know my Hydraulic Cylinder Diameter?
My Response
You can calculate the Intensification Ratio of your machine two ways if you do not know the hydraulic cylinder diameter. The first way to calculate the intensification ratio is to divide the peak plastic injection pressure by the peak hydraulic injection pressure.
The second way to calculate your intensification ratio is to use the machine graph if it has one. The graph usually has lines relating the plastic injection pressure and hydraulic pressure for different screw diameters. Find the line for your screw diameter and divide the peak injection pressure by the hydraulic pressure to calculate the intensification ratio of the machine.
-Andy

Vertical injection vs. Parting line injection for a vertical machine

I was recently asked…
Brian
If I have the option to design my mold for vertical or parting line injection which should I choose assuming I use a vertical machine?
My Response
If your tool is designed for vertical injection in a vertical molding machine you are not limiting yourself to using a vertical machine. A tool that is vertically fed can also be installed in an inline machine and produce parts. If the tool is designed for parting line injection you are limiting yourself to one machine type. If the vertical machine were to break and only an inline machine was available, parts could still be produced on the inline machine assuming machine specs were sufficient for part production.
If parting line injection is better suited for the application and your company can facilitate it, then always use the preferred method for the application.
-Andy