Welcome!

This informative blog allows plastics professionals to discuss plastics training and technology. Brought to you by Routsis Training: the plastic industry's premiere training provider.

Adjusting for Differences from Machine to Machine

This is a topic which often occurs when you are processing with various machines.
M.

How do I compensate for the differences in how my machines handle the transfer from fill to pack?

My Response
Although we often talk in generalities… each brand and generation of machine has it’s quirks.
For example, when using an older ____ controller… I often have use profiling to incrementally drop the injection speed at the end of fill to slow down the large ram so it does not overshoot during pack.
Also, I recently used a ____ all-electric molding machine which would stop the ram when I turned off second stage pack, but would allow the ram to overshoot once pack was turned on. In that case, I had to turn on pack… but reduce the pressure to the minimum setting to get a realistic performance.
Additional Thoughts
Think of it like a car, an older truck may need 3rd gear to climb a hill at 40 MPH… while a newer sports car could easily climb it in 2nd, 3rd, or 4th gear. Some choices are preference… while some are from necessity.
The key is to establish a way to document the process in a manner which can be duplicated and transferred to your different molding machines.
-Andy

Providing a Buffer To Accommodate for Variation

I recently received this follow-up question regarding an earlier blog entry…
Firdaus
To establish a molding parameter, what is the normal percentage tolerence to be used for the injection pressure and other parameters? Currently my process does not have any tolerence and sometimes this may cause difficulty in troubleshooting which will result short mold and etc.
My Response
In general, a well-established process encounters approximately 10% variation. For this reason, it is critical to ensure you have enough room to adjust your process inputs for this. 
For example, if first stage injection becomes pressure-limited, the machine can no longer maintain the desired injection rate, resulting in an inconsistent fill rate and injection time. This generally leads to unwanted short shots, sinks, and flash on the final part.
To avoid a pressure-limited process, you should always have more pressure available to fill the mold than is actually necessary. This will allow the machine to maintain the ‘injection speed set point’, ensuring the highest possible repeatability.
The problem you may encounter is the fact that many machines actually need an additional buffer to perform properly. For instance, a process may reach a peak pressure of 10,000 psi during first stage fill… yet, if the machine has a maximum setting below 10,500 psi, the process could become pressure limited.
The best way to approach this is to do the following…
1) Establish a good process with significantly more pressure than is necessary.
2) Reduce the maximum injection pressure until it affects the injection time by increasing the 1st stage fill time.
3) Increase this maximum by 10-15% to accomodate for material variablity.
I also recommend you review a few of our related posts… including
dditional Thoughts
If you are running a lot of regrind, or off-spec material, you may want to increase this buffer to as much as 20%. In such a case, it is imperative that you use a short-shot during 1st stage fill.
-Andy

How Many Clamps To Use?

In response to a recent blog entry, I got this series of questions…

Mauricio
How many clamps are needed to hold a specific tool? Which is the correct distance between clamps? Is there an order or sequencing to tightening the bolts?

My Response
When asked ‘How many clamps should I use?‘ one plant manager I know likes to respond with ‘As many as you can‘. In reality, each clamping system, mold base, and platen is different. When discussing standard adjustable height mold clamps, I prefer to use six clamps per half on smaller molds, and as many as a dozen for larger molds. In general, the spacing of the clamps are usually dictated by the platen hole location and rail size.
When tightening the bolts, I recommend using an alternating pattern which alternates back and forth as well as up and down. For example, when using a four clamp setup, starting with the top right hand corner, you would tighten in this order:
 Top Right

Bottom Left (diagonally across)

Bottom Right (across)

Top Left (diagonally across)
The intent is to balance the force being applied to the mold base to prevent any uneven stress on the mold base or platen.
Additional Thoughts
Ultimately, the more clamps that you use, the less stress that is applied to any specific clamp point. This will increase the life of the clamps, and help prevent damage to the platen holes. 
-Andy 

Intensification Ratios with Multiple Injection Cylinders…

I received this from a blog reader the other day…
JF
I need to be able to figure intensification ratios for my current presses. Right now I am stumped by the intensification ratios because some of the presses have to parralel cylinders exerting force on the screw…..do you multiply the diameter of both?
note: The intensification ratio is a factor which is used to convert the hydraulic pressure being applied to the hydraulic injection cylinders into the actual pressure being applied to the polymer melt at the front of the screw. For example, if a hydraulic pressure of 1000psi is applied on a machine with a intensification ratio of 12, then the plastic would receive (1000psi)*(12)=12,000psi.
My Response
You are close… when you calculate the intensification ratio, you need to add the surface areas of the two cylinders and use that value in your calculations.
For one cylinder:
Iratio = Acylinder  Ascrew

For two cylinders:
Iratio = (Acylinder 1 Acylinder 2) / Ascrew
or:
Iratio = 2 * (Acylinder) / Ascrew

Additional Thoughts
Determining the intensification ratios for each machine is a critical step in obtaining real process output data from your molding machines.
-Andy

Relying on On-The-Job Training Alone

I heard this comment the other day from a restaurant owner. Although it was not my place to tell him how to run his restaurant, I did think it was a great discussion topic for this blog…

Owner
I can’t bother to train my staff… they learn what they need to know on-the-job.
My Thoughts
Expecting on-the-job training to train all your employees is a very questionable option. It requires time off the job for both the trainer and trainee, and in most cases, the information passed on is limited to a need-to-know basis – making it sparse and incomplete.
In the case of the restaurant, it is unnerving to consider, the employees may never have been taught the true importance of separating the meats from the vegetables, proper temperature settings on refrigeration equipment, or heating my chicken breast to 170ºF.
This got me thinking… how does a typical customer feel when their supplier says the same thing… do they have the same level of concern regarding the products they receive. Are they asking: Does Quality understand our critical factors…? Did the Material Handler understand why my nylon must be dried…? Did Shipping understand why our boxes are labelled in a special way…?
On-The-Job training is good, but it must be tempered with actual knowledge and skill development exercises so that the employees understand the concepts and can apply them to their daily job.
Anyways, the food was cooked (maybe a little too much), but I may never go back to that restaurant again.
-Andy